The law
FACTA Explained: Receipt Truncation, Fraud Alerts, and Your Right to Sue
FACTA limits what card digits a receipt can show and gives identity theft victims fraud alerts and blocks. Here is what it requires, the $100 to $1,000 damages, and deadlines.

FACTA, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, is the federal law that bars businesses from printing more than the last 5 digits of your card number, or the expiration date, on an electronically printed receipt. If a business willfully breaks that rule, you can sue for $100 to $1,000 in statutory damages, and FACTA also gives you tools against identity theft: free credit reports, fraud alerts, and the right to block fraudulent accounts from your credit file.
This guide covers what FACTA requires, how receipt class actions work and what they really pay, the standing problem in federal court, and the identity theft rights most people never use.
Key takeaways.
- The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act; its best-known rule bars printed receipts from showing more than the last 5 card digits or the expiration date.
- A willful violation carries statutory damages of $100 to $1,000 per consumer, plus possible punitive damages and attorney fees.
- FACTA also created free annual credit reports, 1-year and 7-year fraud alerts, and the right to block identity theft information within 4 business days.
- Suits must be filed within 2 years of discovering a violation and no later than 5 years after it happened.
- Some federal courts dismiss receipt cases for lack of concrete harm, so many are now filed in state court.
What FACTA is and how it fits the FCRA
Congress enacted FACTA on December 4, 2003, as a set of amendments to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). It is not a freestanding statute: its rules sit inside the FCRA at 15 U.S.C. 1681 and following, and it is enforced through the FCRA's damages provisions. Our FCRA guide covers the broader law.
FACTA had two goals: cut the raw material identity thieves use, and give victims faster ways to repair the damage. Its main pieces are:
- Receipt truncation (15 U.S.C. 1681c(g)), limiting card data on printed receipts.
- Free annual credit reports (15 U.S.C. 1681j(a)) from each nationwide credit bureau.
- Fraud alerts and active duty alerts (15 U.S.C. 1681c-1).
- Identity theft blocks (15 U.S.C. 1681c-2), which remove fraudulent information from your credit report.
- Business duties carried out through FTC rules, including the Disposal Rule for consumer report information and the Red Flags Rule for identity theft prevention programs.
The receipt rule: what can and cannot be printed
Under 15 U.S.C. 1681c(g), no business that accepts credit or debit cards may print more than the last 5 digits of the card number or the expiration date on a receipt given to the cardholder at the point of sale. Printing the expiration date alone is a violation, even if the card number is fully masked.
The rule has limits:
- It applies only to electronically printed receipts, not handwritten slips or card imprints.
- It covers the receipt handed to the cardholder, not the merchant's own copy.
- It took full effect for all machines by December 4, 2006. Machines first put into use on or after January 1, 2005 had to comply one year after enactment.
Many retailers were sued in the mid-2000s for printing expiration dates. Congress responded with the Credit and Debit Card Receipt Clarification Act, signed June 3, 2008, which says that printing only the expiration date between December 4, 2004 and June 3, 2008 was not a willful violation if the receipt otherwise complied. That safe harbor is long closed; any expiration date printed today falls under the ordinary rule.
Damages: what a FACTA violation is worth
FACTA uses the FCRA's two liability tiers:
| Type of violation | What you can recover | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Willful | Actual damages or $100 to $1,000, plus punitive damages and fees | 15 U.S.C. 1681n |
| Negligent | Actual damages and fees only | 15 U.S.C. 1681o |
For a willful FACTA violation, 15 U.S.C. 1681n(a) allows actual damages or statutory damages of not less than $100 and not more than $1,000 per consumer. Because most receipt plaintiffs cannot show a dollar loss, receipt cases turn on willfulness. In Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Burr (2007), the Supreme Court held that "willful" under the FCRA covers reckless violations as well as knowing ones, so a merchant that ignored a well-publicized rule can be liable even without intent to harm.
Class settlements pay far less than the statutory range suggests. In the Trader Joe's FACTA settlement, a $7.4 million fund covered receipts from 2019 that showed the first 6 and last 4 card digits, and the plaintiff estimated about $102.45 per valid claim. Payments depend on how many people file and what fees the court approves; our guide on how class action money is divided explains the math.
Why many FACTA receipt cases fail in federal court
After the Supreme Court's 2016 decision in Spokeo v. Robins, a federal plaintiff must show a concrete injury, not just a technical statutory violation. That has hit receipt cases hard.
On October 28, 2020, the full Eleventh Circuit held in Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier that a receipt showing the first 6 and last 4 digits, without more, did not give the plaintiff standing, and it threw out approval of a $6.3 million class settlement. Other federal appeals courts have reached different results depending on the digits printed and the harm alleged.
Two practical effects follow. Many new receipt suits are filed in state courts, which can have looser standing rules; the Trader Joe's case, for example, was brought in Los Angeles County Superior Court. And complaints increasingly allege concrete harm, such as time spent monitoring accounts. Our FACTA receipt lawsuit page tracks current cases and investigations.
FACTA's identity theft rights you can use for free
Most people know FACTA from receipt lawsuits, but its most useful parts protect you directly, at no cost.
Free credit reports
FACTA requires each nationwide credit bureau to give you a free report once every 12 months on request. The FTC says the three bureaus have permanently extended a program that lets you check your report from each once a week for free at AnnualCreditReport.com, the only official site.
Fraud alerts
- Initial fraud alert: if you suspect in good faith that you are or may become a victim of identity theft, a bureau must add an alert that lasts at least 1 year. Lenders are supposed to verify your identity before opening new credit.
- Extended fraud alert: if you submit an identity theft report, the alert lasts 7 years.
- Active duty alert: for service members on active duty.
Identity theft blocks
Under 15 U.S.C. 1681c-2, a credit bureau must block fraudulent information from your file no later than 4 business days after it receives proof of identity, an identity theft report, and your identification of the fraudulent items. An identity theft report from IdentityTheft.gov or a police report can serve as the report.
If you received a breach letter, our guide on what to do after a data breach notice walks through these steps in order.
Deadlines and what to do if a receipt broke the rule
Under 15 U.S.C. 1681p, a FACTA or FCRA lawsuit must be filed by the earlier of 2 years after you discover the violation or 5 years after it happened. Because a receipt is in your hand at the time of purchase, courts often treat the purchase date as the discovery date, which makes the practical window about 2 years. This statute of limitations is why receipt class definitions usually reach back 2 years from filing.
If you have a receipt that shows too much:
- Keep the original. Thermal receipts fade, so photograph it right away and store it away from heat.
- Record the details: store location, date, time, and which card you used.
- Save your card statement showing the matching charge.
- Note any fraud on that card after the purchase, and any time or money spent dealing with it.
- Watch for settlement notices. If a settlement already covers your receipt, you file only on the official settlement website, and our guide on proof of purchase for settlements explains what to submit.
If a business printed your full card number or expiration date and you want to know whether you have a claim, a free case review can connect you with independent attorneys who handle FACTA cases.
Common questions.
What is the FACTA law?
FACTA is the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, a set of amendments to the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It limits card data on printed receipts, requires free annual credit reports, and gives identity theft victims fraud alerts and the right to block fraudulent information.
How many credit card digits can be printed on a receipt?
No more than the last 5 digits of the card number, under 15 U.S.C. 1681c(g). The expiration date may not be printed at all. The rule applies to electronically printed receipts given to the cardholder.
How much can you get from a FACTA lawsuit?
For a willful violation, the statute allows actual damages or statutory damages of $100 to $1,000 per consumer, plus possible punitive damages and attorney fees. Class settlements typically pay much less per person, such as the roughly $102 estimate in the Trader Joe's settlement.
Is printing the expiration date on a receipt illegal?
Yes. FACTA bars printing the card expiration date on electronically printed customer receipts. A 2008 law shielded merchants from willful liability for expiration dates printed between December 4, 2004 and June 3, 2008, but that safe harbor does not apply to receipts printed today.
What is the statute of limitations for FACTA?
A FACTA claim must be filed by the earlier of 2 years after you discover the violation or 5 years after it happened, under 15 U.S.C. 1681p.
How long does a fraud alert last?
An initial fraud alert lasts at least 1 year. An extended fraud alert, available if you file an identity theft report, lasts 7 years. You place either by contacting one nationwide credit bureau.
Sources.
Statutes, court rules, appellate opinions, and bar publications we relied on. See our editorial standards.
- 1.15 U.S.C. 1681c, including 1681c(g) receipt truncation (Cornell LII)
- 2.15 U.S.C. 1681n, civil liability for willful noncompliance (Cornell LII)
- 3.15 U.S.C. 1681p, limitation of actions (Cornell LII)
- 4.15 U.S.C. 1681c-1, fraud alerts (Cornell LII)
- 5.15 U.S.C. 1681c-2, identity theft blocks (Cornell LII)
- 6.FTC, Free credit reports
- 7.Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Burr, 551 U.S. 47 (2007) (Cornell LII)
- 8.Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, 11th Cir. en banc opinion (October 28, 2020)
- 9.FTC, Disposing of consumer report information
- 10.Trader Joe's FACTA settlement website
Keep reading.
All guides
Lawsuit
FACTA receipt card number lawsuits
As of September 2026, new FACTA receipt class actions are still being filed (for example against Tavistock Restaurants in Massachusetts in June 2026), the $5 million Sprouts settlement awaits a November 19, 2026 final approval hearing, and claims in the $7.4 million Trader Joe's settlement closed June 9, 2026.

Lawsuit
Credit report errors (FCRA)
As of September 2026, the CFPB's lawsuit against Experian over dispute handling is in discovery, and individual FCRA lawsuits against all three credit bureaus are filed in federal courts every month.

The law
The FCRA explained: your rights over credit reports and background checks

Your rights
What to do after a data breach notice