Class action basics

How many people do you need for a class action?

There is no fixed number, but courts often presume 40 or more class members is enough, and federal CAFA jurisdiction needs 100. What numerosity means for your case.

By the Best Class Actions research deskUpdated 7 min readChecked against court records
A reading desk by a window with an open laptop

There is no set number of people required for a class action. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the class just has to be so large that suing together in one ordinary lawsuit is impracticable. In practice, many federal courts presume a class of 40 or more members is large enough, very small groups (the Supreme Court has suggested 15 is too few) usually are not, and the numbers in between depend on the facts. Separately, federal courts can take class actions under the Class Action Fairness Act only when the class has at least 100 members.

You also do not need to recruit anyone to start. One person can file as the proposed class representative. Here is how courts count, which numbers matter, and what that means if you think a company harmed you and others.

Key takeaways.

  • Federal Rule 23 sets no minimum number; it requires a class "so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable."
  • Many courts presume numerosity at about 40 class members, while the Supreme Court has suggested a group of 15 is too small; facts can change the answer.
  • The Class Action Fairness Act lets federal courts hear class actions with at least 100 members and more than $5 million in controversy, when minimal diversity exists.
  • You only need one person to start: a single lead plaintiff can file on behalf of a class if the class itself is large enough.
  • Size alone is not enough; the class also has to share common questions and meet the other Rule 23 requirements.

What Rule 23 actually requires

The first requirement in Rule 23(a) is known as numerosity. Rule 23(a)(1) allows a class action only if "the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable." Joinder means naming every person as a plaintiff in one lawsuit. The test is not whether joinder is impossible, but whether it would be impractical given the number of people and the circumstances.

The Supreme Court has refused to set a number. In General Telephone Co. of the Northwest v. EEOC (1980), the Court said the numerosity requirement "requires examination of the specific facts of each case and imposes no absolute limitations." In that same opinion, the Court observed that a group as small as 15 employees would be too small to meet the requirement, judged by cases where certification had been denied.

Numerosity is only the first of four Rule 23(a) requirements. See what class certification is for the others.

The numbers courts commonly use

Although no statute sets a minimum, courts have developed rules of thumb:

Class sizeHow courts often treat it
15 or fewerUsually too small unless special facts
About 16 to 39Depends on the circumstances
40 or moreNumerosity often presumed
100 or moreAlso meets the CAFA size floor

The Second Circuit held in Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Town of Hyde Park (1995) that numerosity is presumed at a level of 40 members, a line that many federal courts across the country cite. These are guides, not rules: a court may certify a smaller class if members are spread across the country, cannot easily be identified, have small claims they would never bring alone, or fear retaliation (common in employment cases). It may reject a larger class if everyone is easy to find and join.

The 100-member rule under CAFA

A different number matters for which court hears the case. The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 gives federal courts jurisdiction over large interstate class actions. Under 28 U.S.C. 1332(d), a federal court has jurisdiction over a class action when the aggregated claims exceed $5 million and any class member is a citizen of a different state than any defendant, but the law does not apply if the proposed classes total fewer than 100 members.

So a class of 60 people can still be a valid class action, but it would generally need to be in state court, or in federal court on some other basis such as a federal statute. CAFA also treats "mass actions," where 100 or more people's monetary claims are proposed to be tried jointly, as removable to federal court. See class action vs. mass tort.

You only need one person to start

A common misconception is that you must gather a group before a lawyer will file. You do not. Rule 23(a) says "one or more members of a class may sue" as representative parties on behalf of all members. Many class actions are filed by a single named plaintiff, with others added later from different states or subgroups.

What the lawyer needs is evidence that many others were affected the same way, such as company-wide policies, customer counts from public filings, a breach notice listing how many people were affected, or a stream of similar complaints. The rest of the class is identified later through company records. Our guide on how to start a class action lawsuit walks through the steps.

Why size alone does not make a class action

A class action with a million people in the class can still fail. The class also needs common questions whose answers resolve everyone's claims at once, a representative whose claims are typical, and adequate counsel. For damages cases, common issues must predominate.

Class size can also shrink during a case. In TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, decided June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court held that only 1,853 of the 8,185 class members, those whose misleading credit reports were actually sent to third parties, had the concrete harm needed to recover damages. Under Rule 23(c)(5), a court can also divide a class into subclasses, each of which is treated as its own class. Class definitions can also be narrowed to certain states, dates, or products, as with the class definitions in the Costa Del Mar repair settlement, which excludes Florida residents.

What collective actions and small groups need

Workplace overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act use a different system. Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b), no employee becomes a party to an FLSA collective action unless they give written consent and it is filed with the court. Because workers must opt in, there is no Rule 23 numerosity test for the collective itself, though courts still decide whether the workers are "similarly situated." Some FLSA collective actions involve only a few dozen workers. See unpaid overtime lawsuits.

If you think a company treated you and others unfairly, the number of people you personally know about does not need to be large. A free case review takes about two minutes and connects you with independent attorneys who handle these cases, and you can browse lawsuits attorneys are investigating or pursuing to see if a case already exists.

Free case review

Find out if you have a claim.

Answer two questions and leave your contact details. If your situation fits, an independent attorney who handles these cases will follow up. Free, and you are never obligated to hire anyone.

Attorney advertising. Best Class Actions is not a law firm.

Common questions.

How many people do you need for a class action lawsuit?

There is no fixed minimum. Rule 23 requires a class so numerous that joining everyone in one lawsuit is impracticable, and many courts presume that 40 or more members is enough. The Supreme Court has suggested that a group of 15 is too small.

Can one person file a class action?

Yes. Rule 23 allows one or more class members to sue as representatives on behalf of the whole class. The individual who files becomes the proposed lead plaintiff, and the rest of the class is identified later.

Is 10 people enough for a class action?

Usually not. Courts generally find that groups that small can simply join together as co-plaintiffs in a regular lawsuit, so joinder is not impracticable. Unusual facts, such as members who cannot be identified or located, can occasionally change that result.

What is the numerosity requirement?

Numerosity is the first requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a). It means the class must be so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. There is no set number, but the Second Circuit and many other courts presume numerosity at 40 members.

Does a class action need 100 people?

Only for federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act, which does not apply to classes with fewer than 100 members. A smaller class can still proceed in state court or in federal court on another basis, such as a federal statute.

Do I need to find other people before contacting a lawyer?

No. You only need your own facts and some sign that others were affected the same way. The lawyer investigates the scope of the problem, and the class is identified later through the company's records.

Sources.

Statutes, court rules, appellate opinions, and bar publications we relied on. See our editorial standards.

  1. 1.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (Cornell LII)
  2. 2.General Telephone Co. of the Northwest v. EEOC, 446 U.S. 318 (1980) (Cornell LII)
  3. 3.Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Town of Hyde Park, 47 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1995) (CourtListener)
  4. 4.28 U.S.C. 1332(d), Class Action Fairness Act jurisdiction (Cornell LII)
  5. 5.29 U.S.C. 216, FLSA collective actions (Cornell LII)
  6. 6.TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021) (Cornell LII)
  7. 7.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011) (Cornell LII)

Keep reading.

All guides