Food and consumer products

Lawsuit filed

Thermos Recall Injury Lawsuit: Stainless King Food Jar Stoppers and Eye Injuries

Thermos recalled 8.2 million food jars and bottles after stoppers shot out and blinded 3 people. Injured users may have a claim; a class action is pending.

By the Best Class Actions research deskUpdated 7 min readChecked against court records
A grocery store aisle seen from a shopping cart handle

If a stopper shot out of a recalled Thermos Stainless King food jar or Sportsman bottle and hit you, especially in the eye, you may have a personal injury claim, and attorneys are reviewing these cases now. Thermos recalled about 8.2 million containers on April 30, 2026 after three people suffered permanent vision loss. A separate proposed class action for buyers, Meaney v. Thermos, is pending in federal court in Chicago. Owners who were not hurt can get a free replacement stopper or bottle.

Below: which containers are recalled, what the lawsuits claim, who may qualify, and what to do first.

Free case review

Do you own a recalled Thermos Stainless King food jar or Sportsman bottle?

Two quick questions, then where to reach you. If your situation fits, an independent attorney who handles these cases follows up. Free, no obligation.

Key takeaways.

  • Thermos recalled about 5.8 million Stainless King food jars and 2.3 million Sportsman bottles on April 30, 2026 after 27 reports of stoppers striking people, including three cases of permanent vision loss.
  • The hazard: food stored too long can build pressure, and the stopper has no center pressure relief, so it can shoot out on opening.
  • The remedy is a free pressure-relief stopper (food jars) or a replacement bottle (Sportsman), not a refund.
  • Meaney v. Thermos, filed May 4, 2026 in Chicago federal court, seeks to represent buyers nationwide; it is an allegation, not a ruling.
  • If you were injured, keep the container and stopper; do not throw the stopper away for the recall until you get advice.

You may qualify if.

  • People struck in the eye, face, or body by a stopper that shot out of a Thermos Stainless King food jar (SK3000 or SK3020) or Sportsman bottle (SK3010) when opened.
  • Injuries such as vision loss, a detached retina, a corneal injury, fractures, or cuts that needed stitches make the strongest individual claims.
  • Buyers of the recalled containers in the U.S. for personal or household use may fit the proposed class in Meaney v. Thermos, which seeks refunds and damages, not injury compensation.
  • Recalled jars were sold from about March 2008 through July 2024 at Target, Walmart, Amazon, Thermos.com, and other stores, for about $30.
  • Owners who were not hurt can get a free replacement stopper or bottle through the recall now.

What to gather.

  • 1The jar or bottle and the stopper that ejected, kept as they are, not thrown away or mailed back for the recall remedy.
  • 2The model number printed on the bottom of the container (SK3000, SK3020, or SK3010).
  • 3Eye doctor, ER, and specialist records, including vision tests before and after if you have them.
  • 4Photos of the injury and of the container, plus a note of what food or drink was inside and how long it had been stored.
  • 5Proof of purchase, such as an Amazon, Target, or Walmart order history, if you can find it.

What the Thermos recall and lawsuits are about

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission announced the recall (number 26-444) on April 30, 2026. It covers two product lines from Thermos L.L.C. of Schaumburg, Illinois.

Thermos Stainless King food jars (SK3000 and SK3020)

The 16-ounce (SK3000) and 24-ounce (SK3020) Stainless King Food Jars manufactured before July 2023 are recalled, about 5.8 million units. The model number is printed on the bottom of the jar. The recalled stoppers do not have a pressure relief in the center.

Thermos Sportsman Food & Beverage Bottles (SK3010)

All 40-ounce Sportsman Food & Beverage Bottles, model SK3010, are recalled, about 2.3 million units.

Both were sold in many colors at Target, Walmart, and other stores, and online at Amazon.com, Walmart.com, Target.com, and Thermos.com, from around March 2008 through July 2024 for about $30.

Why the stoppers eject

CPSC says that if perishable food or drinks are stored in the container for an extended time, the stopper can forcefully eject when opened. Food that spoils or ferments gives off gas, and without a pressure relief the gas builds up behind the stopper. Thermos had 27 reports of people struck by an ejected stopper, including impact and laceration injuries that needed medical attention, and three people suffered permanent vision loss after being hit in the eye.

The lawsuits build on these facts. They claim Thermos marketed the containers for carrying hot and cold food without warning that pressure could build to a dangerous level, and that the company knew of the problem before the recall.

How to check your Thermos and get the recall remedy

Start with the bottom of the container. The model number is printed there. Only three model numbers are in the recall:

ModelProductSizeRemedy
SK3000Stainless King Food Jar (made before July 2023)16 ozNew pressure-relief stopper
SK3020Stainless King Food Jar (made before July 2023)24 ozNew pressure-relief stopper
SK3010Sportsman Food & Beverage Bottle (all)40 ozReplacement bottle

A quick visual check also helps: the recalled stoppers have no pressure relief in the center. Thermos products with other model numbers are not listed in this recall.

To get the remedy, contact Thermos, not the store. Thermos takes requests at support.thermos.com, through the "Recall Info" link on thermos.com, or by phone at 662-563-6822 from 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. CT, Monday through Friday.

  • Food jars (SK3000, SK3020): Thermos asks you to throw away the old stopper and send a photo showing it was disposed of. It then sends a new stopper with pressure relief.
  • Sportsman bottles (SK3010): Thermos sends a prepaid shipping label so you can return the bottle, and you receive a replacement bottle.

Until the new stopper arrives, CPSC says to stop using the recalled containers immediately.

If someone in your home was injured, do not throw away the stopper or mail back the bottle yet. Photograph it, keep it, and get advice first; the recall remedy asks you to give up the very evidence an injury claim depends on.

Where the Thermos lawsuits stand

The Meaney class action

Meaney, et al. v. Thermos, LLC, No. 1:26-cv-05163, was filed on May 4, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, where it is assigned to Judge Joan H. Lefkow. The plaintiffs seek to represent everyone who bought the recalled containers in the U.S. for personal or household use, with subclasses in New York, New Jersey, and Ohio, under state consumer fraud laws including the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.

The complaint says Thermos was on notice in 2024, when a customer complained that a 16-ounce Stainless King container "explosively" decompressed and the lid flew 8 to 10 feet. It also argues the recall remedy is not enough because it offers a replacement part rather than a cash refund. As of September 2026, no class has been certified and no settlement has been announced. Thermos has not been found liable, and the claims are allegations.

Individual injury claims

The class action seeks money back for buyers; it does not compensate injuries. People who were hurt bring their own claims, and several law firms have said they are reviewing eye injury cases. Joining a class action as a buyer would not stop you from pursuing a separate injury claim, but a class settlement release could affect some claims, so read any notice carefully. See class action vs. individual lawsuit.

Who may qualify for a Thermos injury claim

Your situationLikely pathWhat you might get
Own a recalled jar, not hurtRecall remedyFree stopper or bottle
Bought one, want money backProposed class (Meaney)Refund or damages if it succeeds
Hit by a stopper, minor bruiseUsually recall onlySmall, if any
Eye injury or vision lossIndividual injury claimMedical costs, lost income, pain
Cut or fracture needing treatmentIndividual injury claimMedical costs, pain

The strongest claims involve a documented eye injury: a corneal abrasion or laceration, bleeding inside the eye, a detached retina, or lasting vision loss. Three of the 27 incidents Thermos reported to CPSC involved permanent vision loss, which shows how serious these injuries can be.

You probably do not have an injury claim if the stopper popped but missed you, or if your container is not one of the three recalled model numbers. Stainless King food jars manufactured in or after July 2023 are not part of the recall.

If you are unsure whether your jar is covered, turn it over and read the model number on the bottom before contacting Thermos.

When the injured person is a child

Insulated food jars are often packed in school lunches, so some of the people most likely to open one are children. If a child was hurt, the claim usually belongs to the child and is brought by a parent or guardian, and parents may have their own claim for the medical bills they paid. Many states pause the filing deadline for a minor's own claim until age 18, but the parents' claim for costs may run on the normal schedule. Courts in many states must approve any settlement of a child's injury claim, and the money is often held in a protected account until the child becomes an adult. Keep school nurse notes, pediatric and eye doctor records, and any photos from the day it happened.

What compensation could look like

For owners, the recall remedy is the current payout: a free replacement pressure-relief stopper for SK3000 and SK3020 food jars, or a free replacement bottle for the SK3010 Sportsman. Thermos is not offering cash refunds through the recall.

If the Meaney class action succeeds or settles, buyers could receive money, but consumer product class settlements typically pay a modest amount per item, often a fraction of the purchase price, and more with proof of purchase. With a product that sold for about $30, any per-person payment is likely to be small. See whether you need proof of purchase.

Injury claims are valued very differently. Damages can include eye surgery and specialist care, future treatment, lost wages, and pain and suffering, and permanent vision loss is a serious, lifelong injury. Economic losses from an injury, such as missed work or a parent's time off to care for an injured child, can also be part of a claim. No Thermos injury case has produced a public verdict or settlement as of September 2026, so there is no Thermos-specific benchmark, and nothing here predicts what any claim is worth.

The law behind Thermos stopper claims

Injury claims are brought under state product liability law:

  • Strict liability for a design defect: a stopper with no pressure relief is unreasonably dangerous when the container is used to carry food, as it was marketed.
  • Failure to warn: the product did not adequately warn that stored food could build pressure and turn the stopper into a projectile.
  • Negligence: the company did not act reasonably on earlier complaints.

The class action relies on state consumer protection statutes that bar deceptive practices and omissions, plus warranty claims. Thermos is expected to argue that users stored food too long and that the recall remedy fixes the problem. For a plain-English overview of how a recall differs from a class action, see our guide.

Deadlines for Thermos claims

There is no claim deadline in the class action yet, because nothing has been certified or settled. If that happens, the court will approve a notice with dates, and claims will be filed only on an official settlement website.

For injuries, the statute of limitations is set by your state. Most states give injured people two or three years from the date of injury to file, and some give only one year. Illinois, where Thermos is based, generally allows two years for personal injury. Because the recalled jars were sold for more than 15 years, some states' statutes of repose, which can bar claims based on how long ago a product was sold, may also matter for older containers.

What to do if a Thermos stopper injured you

  1. See an eye doctor promptly for any eye strike, even if vision seems fine. Some retinal injuries show up later.
  2. Keep the container and stopper. The recall asks owners to throw away the stopper and send a photo, or mail back Sportsman bottles. If you were injured, hold off until you have advice, and photograph everything.
  3. Write down what was inside, how long it had been stored, and what happened when you opened it.
  4. Save proof of purchase from Amazon, Target, Walmart, or Thermos order histories.
  5. Do not sign a release or accept a payment from Thermos or an insurer before you understand your injury.
  6. Report the incident to CPSC at SaferProducts.gov.

If you or your child was hurt by a Thermos stopper, independent attorneys who handle product injury cases can review what happened. A free case review takes about two minutes. For other kitchen product injuries, see our pressure cooker burn lawsuit page and our food recall injury page.

Case timeline

  1. 2026-04-30

    Thermos and CPSC recall about 8.2 million Stainless King food jars and Sportsman bottles after 27 stopper incidents, including three cases of permanent vision loss.

  2. 2026-05-04

    Meaney v. Thermos, LLC, a proposed nationwide class action, is filed in the Northern District of Illinois.

Free case review

See if you qualify for the Thermos food jar recall case.

Answer two questions and leave your contact details. If your situation fits, an independent attorney who handles these cases will follow up. Free, and you are never obligated to hire anyone.

Attorney advertising. Best Class Actions is not a law firm.

Thermos food jar recall: common questions.

Is there a Thermos recall lawsuit?

Yes. Meaney v. Thermos, LLC was filed May 4, 2026 in federal court in Chicago on behalf of buyers of the recalled food jars and bottles, and attorneys are reviewing individual injury claims. The claims are allegations and no class has been certified.

Which Thermos products are recalled?

Thermos Stainless King Food Jars model SK3000 (16 ounces) and SK3020 (24 ounces) made before July 2023, and all Thermos Sportsman Food and Beverage Bottles model SK3010 (40 ounces). The model number is on the bottom of the container.

Can I get a refund for my recalled Thermos?

Not through the recall. Thermos offers a free replacement pressure-relief stopper for the food jars and a free replacement bottle for the Sportsman bottle. The Meaney class action argues buyers should get money back, but that has not been decided.

Can I sue Thermos for an eye injury?

Possibly. If a stopper from a recalled container struck your eye and caused an injury, you may have a product liability claim. Keep the container and stopper, get your eye examined, and act before your state's deadline, which is often two or three years.

Why do Thermos food jar lids explode?

According to CPSC, perishable food or drinks stored in the container for an extended time can build pressure, and the recalled stoppers have no pressure relief in the center, so they can forcefully eject when opened.

How do I get a replacement Thermos stopper?

Contact Thermos at support.thermos.com, through the Recall Info link on thermos.com, or at 662-563-6822. For food jars you will be asked to throw away the old stopper and send a photo; for Sportsman bottles you will get a prepaid label to return the bottle.

Sources.

Statutes, court rules, appellate opinions, and bar publications we relied on. See our editorial standards.

  1. 1.CPSC recall 26-444: Thermos recalls 8.2 million Stainless King food jars and bottles (Apr. 30, 2026)
  2. 2.ClassAction.org: Thermos recall 2026 class action filed over alleged stopper defect, Meaney v. Thermos, No. 1:26-cv-05163 (May 6, 2026)
  3. 3.CourtListener docket: Meaney v. Thermos, L.L.C., No. 1:26-cv-05163 (N.D. Ill.)
  4. 4.Enjuris: Thermos recall, April 2026
  5. 5.Thermos support and recall information
  6. 6.CPSC SaferProducts.gov incident reporting
  7. 7.Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, 735 ILCS 5/13-202 (two-year personal injury limitations period)
  8. 8.Nigh Goldenberg Raso & Vaughn: Thermos recall eye injury lawsuit review

Related cases and settlements.

All lawsuits