Food and consumer products settlement
Paid outLennox Evaporator Coil Settlement: What It Covered, Why It Is Closed, and Options for Leaking Coils Now
Closed: the Thomas v. Lennox coil settlement covered uncoated copper coils bought 2007 to 2015, with a $75 rebate and up to $550 per repeat replacement. Claims ended.

The Lennox evaporator coil settlement, Thomas v. Lennox Industries Inc., is closed and not accepting claims. It covered new uncoated copper tube coils sold under the Lennox, Aire-Flo, Armstrong Air, AirEase, Concord, and Ducane brands between October 29, 2007 and July 9, 2015. The court approved it on December 9, 2015, and the main claim deadline was February 1, 2016.
If your Lennox coil is leaking now, this settlement will not pay for it, and as of September 2026 we found no newer class settlement over Lennox coil leaks. Below: what the deal provided, who qualified, and what owners of leaking coils can still do.
Settlement fund
Warranty and reimbursement program (no fixed fund)
Paid out
- Claim deadline
- February 1, 2016
- Proof
- Proof required
- What you can get
- A $75 service rebate after a first coil replacement within five years, a coated copper or aluminum replacement coil if a replacement failed, and up to $550 per eligible repeat replacement for labor and refrigerant
- Who qualifies
- U.S. residents who bought, new, at least one uncoated copper tube Lennox, Aire-Flo, Armstrong Air, AirEase, Concord, or Ducane evaporator coil for household use between October 29, 2007 and July 9, 2015, installed in a U.S. residence and covered by an original warranty.
Filing is free and done only on the court-approved site run by Kurtzman Carson Consultants (KCC). Best Class Actions is not the administrator.
Key takeaways.
- The Lennox evaporator coil settlement is closed. Judge Sara L. Ellis granted final approval on December 9, 2015, and the main claim deadline was February 1, 2016.
- It covered new uncoated copper tube coils sold under six brands, including Lennox, Armstrong Air, Ducane, and AirEase, bought between October 29, 2007 and July 9, 2015.
- Benefits were not cash for everyone: a $75 service rebate, a better replacement coil if a replacement failed, and up to $550 per repeat replacement for labor and refrigerant.
- Only original purchasers whose original coil had to be replaced within five years of installation qualified.
- There is no newer Lennox coil class settlement to join as of September 2026. Owners with leaking coils today rely on Lennox's warranty and state warranty law.
| Case | Thomas, et al. v. Lennox Industries Inc. |
|---|---|
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Judge Sara L. Ellis, No. 1:13-cv-07747 |
| Settlement fund | Warranty and reimbursement program (no fixed fund) |
| Claim deadline | February 1, 2016 |
| Opt out or object by | November 11, 2015 |
| Final approval hearing | December 9, 2015 |
| Administrator | Kurtzman Carson Consultants (KCC) |
What the Lennox coil settlement resolved
An evaporator coil is the indoor part of a central air conditioner or heat pump that absorbs heat from the air. The class action, filed in 2013 in federal court in Chicago, alleged that Lennox manufactured and sold defective uncoated copper tube evaporator coils that could leak refrigerant, leaving homeowners to pay for repeated repairs.
Lennox denied all of the claims and agreed to settle to avoid the cost and risk of further litigation. The court preliminarily approved the settlement on July 9, 2015. Judge Sara L. Ellis entered the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal on December 9, 2015, certifying the settlement class and approving a fee and expense award of $1,250,000 plus $2,500 service awards to each class representative.
Unlike a cash fund, the settlement worked as an expanded warranty and reimbursement program, with benefits handled through independent Lennox dealers and the settlement administrator, Kurtzman Carson Consultants. For other home equipment claims, see our LG refrigerator lawsuit and GE washer and dryer lawsuit pages.
Who qualified for the Lennox evaporator coil settlement?
The settlement class was U.S. residents who bought, new, at least one uncoated copper tube evaporator coil from these brands: Lennox, Aire-Flo, Armstrong Air, AirEase, Concord, or Ducane. The coil had to be:
- bought between October 29, 2007 and July 9, 2015 (the class period), separately, inside an air handler, or in a packaged unit;
- covered by an original Lennox warranty;
- bought for personal, family, or household use; and
- installed in a U.S. house, condo, apartment, or other residence.
To get any benefit, the original coil had to need replacement within five years of installation. Buyers of newly built homes with the coils already installed were eligible, but later owners of a home, called subsequent purchasers, were not. Coated copper and aluminum tube coils were not in the class.
What the Lennox settlement paid
Benefits depended on how many times a coil failed:
| Benefit | Who got it | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Service rebate | First replacement within 5 years | $75 toward future service |
| Replacement coil warranty | Replacement coil failed | Coated copper or aluminum coil |
| Labor and refrigerant | Two or more replacements | Up to $550 each |
The $75 rebate was not a check: it was a form redeemable for one year for service from an independent dealer listed on the settlement site. If a covered replacement coil also failed, the claimant could get a coated copper or aluminum tube coil plus up to $550 for labor and refrigerant, with that warranty lasting up to five years after the replacement was installed. Reimbursement of up to $550 per eligible replacement required at least two coil replacements; one replacement alone did not qualify for cash.
No public report shows a total paid or an average benefit. Our guide on how settlement benefits are divided explains why warranty-style settlements are hard to value.
Key dates for the Lennox coil settlement
| Event | Date |
|---|---|
| Preliminary approval | July 9, 2015 |
| Opt-out and objection deadline | November 11, 2015 |
| Final approval | December 9, 2015 |
| Main claim deadline | February 1, 2016 |
| Late replacement claims | 60 days after replacement |
The claim deadline was February 1, 2016, or 60 days after the original coil was replaced, whichever was later, as long as the replacement came within five years of installation. Because the class period ended July 9, 2015, that five-year window closed for the last covered coils around 2020, and the replacement coil warranty ran up to five years beyond that. As of September 2026, the settlement website is offline and the program is effectively complete.
What to do if your Lennox coil is leaking now
If you missed this settlement or your system was installed after July 2015, these steps apply:
- Check your warranty. Find your model and serial numbers, the installation date, and whether the product was registered, then read the written warranty for what it covers (parts, labor, or both).
- Get the diagnosis in writing. Ask the technician to note that the evaporator coil leaked, the refrigerant added, and the coil type (copper or aluminum).
- Keep the failed coil or photos and every invoice, in case a claim or lawsuit develops.
- Know your warranty rights. The federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and state law can help when a written warranty is not honored; see our Magnuson-Moss explainer.
Separately, a proposed antitrust class action, Berg v. Robert Bosch, LLC, filed in federal court in Michigan in March 2026, names Lennox among seven HVAC makers accused of conspiring to keep equipment prices high. That case is an allegation only and has not been certified or settled.
Lennox evaporator coil settlement: common questions.
Is the Lennox evaporator coil settlement still open?
No. The Thomas v. Lennox settlement received final approval on December 9, 2015, and the main claim deadline was February 1, 2016, or 60 days after a qualifying coil replacement. The settlement website is offline and no new claims are being taken.
How much did the Lennox coil settlement pay?
It paid a $75 service rebate after a first coil replacement within five years, a coated copper or aluminum replacement coil if a replacement failed, and up to $550 per eligible repeat replacement for labor and refrigerant. Cash reimbursement required at least two coil replacements.
Which brands were in the Lennox evaporator coil settlement?
Uncoated copper tube evaporator coils sold under the Lennox, Aire-Flo, Armstrong Air, AirEase, Concord, and Ducane brands, bought new between October 29, 2007 and July 9, 2015 for use in a U.S. home.
Is there a class action lawsuit against Lennox for leaking coils?
As of September 2026, we found no new class action settlement over Lennox coil leaks after the 2015 Thomas v. Lennox settlement. Owners with leaking coils today generally rely on Lennox's written warranty and state warranty law.
Did I need to be the original owner for the Lennox coil settlement?
Yes. The class covered people who bought the coil new, including buyers of newly built homes with the coil already installed. Subsequent purchasers of a home were not included.
Who ran the Lennox evaporator coil settlement?
Kurtzman Carson Consultants (KCC) served as the settlement administrator, and benefits were redeemed through independent Lennox dealers. The case was Thomas v. Lennox Industries Inc., No. 13-cv-7747, in the Northern District of Illinois.
Sources.
Statutes, court rules, appellate opinions, and bar publications we relied on. See our editorial standards.

